Quality and Variety of Exports from the New EU Member States: Evidence from Very Disaggregated Data
Working Paper 2/2010
According to trade theories, the average quantity of exported goods is not the only parameter of export performance – the variety and quality of exports also play an important role. The goal of this paper is to evaluate the variety and quality of exports from the new EU Member States Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia (NMS) in 1999–2009. The analysis is done on the basis of methodology proposed by R. C. Feenstra (7) and further developed by D. Hummels and P. Klenow (13), and Ch. Broda and D. E. Weinstein (4). Although unit values play an important role in defining export quality, the calculations herein take into account also market shares and the level of monopoly power of firms in a particular market. In addition, this study contributes to the existing literature by providing a different way of evaluating the variety assuming that the number of exported brands follows the Poisson distribution. The calculations show that exports from NMSs in 2009 were of lower quality in comparison with German exports: relative quality was ranging between 0.30 and 0.55. It was found that all NMSs significantly increased their average number of brands exported to the EU market; moreover, all NMSs were able to increase the average quality of their exports during the 10-year reference period. Finally, relative quality is much more stable than relative prices, providing evidence that the measure of relative quality developed herein is better than the traditional proxy, i.e. relative export prices, as it does not include relative costs of production but reflects structural factors.
Keywords: new EU Member States, exports, quality, variety
JEL classification: C43, F12, F14, O52
Research published: The quality and variety of exports from the new EU member states. Economics of Transition, vol.19, No.4, pp.723-747 Available: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-0351.2011.00423.x/abstract